Why historically (and currently) only one single bid was allowed for each DSP per impression? Why hide demand from the exchange and create opportunities for the DSPs to arbitrage? – I know this is changing now with the possibility of multiple bids per DSP (openRTB v2) but why ad exchanges let this happen at the beginning? This question was asked on quora, below is my answer.
A multiple bid response was discussed at the very first OpenRTB meeting. It was not seen as a favorable feature by the demand side, at first. They preferred submitting one bid. Supply side partners were not in a position to force the issue, nor had the necessary research been done to support the idea.
From the supply side’s perspective, as with many transaction systems, early efforts in RTB were focused on connecting the pipes. RTB represented a new source of demand and the pressure was applied to getting plugged in to as many DSPs as possible. Read more
What technical, operational and campaign performance [bidder] KPI’s should be considered when ramping up, and are there any industry benchmarks? This question was asked on quora, below is my answer.
From a technical perspective you’ll want to measure how many different types of inventory you support: mobile, app, web, video, facebook ads etc… You’ll want to track how many SSPs you’re integrated with and how many impressions are available to you. You should look into creating a feature matrix and decide which advertising features you and your customers find most important.
On the operations side you’ll want to make sure your bidding system is responding to bid requests quickly. The round-trip time for a bid response, from an SSPs perspective, should be no more than 100ms – and even that is pushing it these days. Your internal bidding algorithm should probably make a decision in less than 30 or 40ms. This allows about 60ms for network latency between the bidder and the SSP. Some SSPs have DSP latency monitoring available. This type of monitoring will give you insight into what the SSP is seeing. Read more
… than when purchasing through an ad exchange or even using an ad server? I am tasked with helping to expand my company’s online marketing, the options we are looking at are essentially 1) using an ad server to manage ‘private’ media buys 2) using an ad exchange like OpenX Market or 3) using a DSP. One major factor in this decision is the amount of data we can collect in order to optimise media buys. This question was asked on Quora, below is my answer.
In the current marketplace a DSP is going to be able to give you more insight into your buys across many exchanges and SSPs. They are built from the ground up to cater to the needs of buyers.
You’ll want to find a DSP that can work with many SSP and exchange’s private marketplace technology stacks. You may even find yourself using an SSP’s interface to place orders with particular publishers. Those deals are likely to be executed through the SSP/DSP technologies, so you’ll still need your DSP to act as the buying agent once the deal is done.
Since data collection is one of your primary needs, you might consider using a 3rd party ad server if the DSP you’re working with doesn’t have one that suits you. You can use an ad server as a service or set aside some hardware and install one on your own.
I dug into this win price problem several months ago after noticing the same jump in spend at that hour. Rubicon is on Pacific time so we refer to this as the “9 O’Clock Bump” effect.
Dr. Richter pointing at a Dodo bird. “Adapt or perish”
After asking several DSPs about the problem we determined that it was, indeed, campaign budgets resetting combined with less-than-optimal pacing algorithms and in some cases lack thereof.
We’re in the process of finishing up some documentation on our pacing algorithm that does a pretty good job pacing to the needs of the campaign while considering the fairly predictable traffic pattern throughout the day. We’ll be putting this information out in the next couple weeks. Hopefully it will inspire some folks in the market to upgrade their systems and resolve some of this win price inefficiency. I’ll update post with a link to the document once we release it.
UPDATE: The document is finally out the door. You can read it here.
[For demand side platforms,] is it the optimization of the bids, the allocation of budgets, managing potential conflicts between advertising campaigns from multiple customers and buying data? Or is it more related to other issues such as customer relations and getting ad networks out of competition? This question was asked on Quora.com, below is my answer.
Mature Demand Side Platforms (DSPs) have conquered the primary requirements to being in business in the online ad space, including: campaign pacing, optimization of bids, campaign goals and budget allocations. The old guard is now well established. New DSPs, presumably with novel approaches to the market, may encounter some of these basic challenges. There are a lot of examples they can look at in the market for guidance. Read more
iOS is still using the GD dark patterns to influence your choices. @AppleSupport, can you tell your folks to stop using dark patterns? If you have a recommendation, just make the recommendation. Don't trick people into tapping what you want them to tap. https://youtu.be/kxkrdLI6e6M