Banner Ad: Please Fix Your Pacing Algorithm
Decorative Header Image

Tag Archive for RTB

What would be killer features for a brand-new SSP?

There are quite a few Supply Side Platforms on the market. What product features would make a new one stand out? Or just name the most important features of an SSP solution, please.

This question was asked on Quora.com, below is my answer.

Supply Side Platform (SSP)The primary customer of the Supply Side Platform is the publisher. Most features are geared toward publisher needs. Access to demand is the paramount feature. Maximizing publisher yield over the long-term is also critically important. Companies that were already yield optimizers have taken the lead in the online display SSP space.

Additional features found in the top-shelf SSPs are reporting insights into the demand (i.e. who’s buying the inventory) as well as incorporating pricing intelligence into audience segments (i.e. what are my users worth). Armed with these two tools, a publisher is empowered to make more informed direct sales.

In fact, some SSPs are building utilities so support those direct sales efforts via the RTB protocol. This is being referred to in the industry as “programmatic trading” or “programmatic buying and selling”.

I think these are all stand out features of SSPs. Then there’s the one that doesn’t get mentioned too much: scale. Scale is probably the toughest challenge a Supply Side Platform will face. Consider that a killer feature, as well.

Opportunities and Challenges in a Fragmented Mobile Landscape

This is the first in a series of posts walking readers through the mobile advertising space. Stay tuned for more posts over the coming weeks. This is also posted on the Rubicon Project blog.

Fragmented Mobile

Fixing Mobile

Everyone recognizes that mobile advertising is a rapidly growing market. How fast is it growing? eMarketer has current year revenue estimates at $3.9 Billion. According to the Yankee Group mobile ad sales should nearly triple by 2016 to $10 Billion.  I think this estimate is low given the acceleration in market growth we’ve experienced so far this year alone. Revised eMarketer numbers now indicate nearly 100% growth for 2012 over 2011.  Further, eMarketer predicts that mobile will grow to over $23 Billion by 2016. This is much more consistent with Mary Meeker’s prediction of a $20 Billion mobile market.

Given this tremendous market opportunity, we have seen first-hand that numerous publishers are moving to mobile – building mobile applications, optimizing their web content and trying to figure out how to turn that mobile content into a dependable revenue stream. We are glad publishers are jumping in and are excited to be in the mobile space as well. However, we have also witnessed headwinds in this developing market and would like to use this blog to help publishers address these challenges.

The mobile display advertising space has some distinct challenges that fly in the face of the status quo of online display. These challenges conspire to make it more difficult for publishers to advertise across their mobile inventory. A primary complication is that there are three major operating systems (plus Blackberry), each with subtle differences that require research and technology to overcome. Let’s explore how each of these platforms differ.

Apple’s iPhones do not support Flash and ship with third party cookies disabled by default. The lack of Flash strongly affects the user experience and the ability to deliver Flash-based rich media creatives that render in online display (troublesome on iPad, where standard display ads are typically viewed with little loss of fidelity relative to their online counterparts). Additionally, the lack of third party cookies makes it difficult to perform simple audience targeting that we’ve grown accustomed to.

Microsoft’s Windows Phone 8 platform is touted as having twice as much HTML 5 support, but still lags behind Chrome (Android), Safari (iOS) and even Blackberry.  We are hopeful that Windows Phone 8 will support HTML 5 to the point that publishers and advertisers can leverage the same mobile web ads across platforms.  However, there is a possibility that a lack of full HTML 5 support will require custom ad units for this platform. On top of that, Windows Phone 8 may also ship with the new Do Not Track (DNT) flag turned on, severely limiting the ability for publishers to achieve higher rates through traditional tracking and targeting.

Google’s Android platform seems to be the most compliant to the needs of the industry.  Android supports 3rd party cookies, DNT is disabled by default, device IDs are available in the app environment and it even supports Flash.  Of course this all supports Google’s advertising business, but they’re nice enough to keep the platform open for a variety of complementary and competitive third parties. By creating an environment most closely resembling online display, Google has made it easier for publishers to incorporate Android to their mobile experiences.

Where does all of this fragmentation leave us? Many publishers have been successful in traversing this fragmented market. If you are new to mobile, it can be daunting to figure out where to start. A logical starting point is to figure out what mobile devices are most common among your audience and focus on building your mobile presence there (at least initially). That way you limit the number of challenges you have to deal with. Eventually you will have to accommodate users across a variety of devices and platforms, so working with a partner that is platform-agnostic is critical. Look for partners that have a history of ad serving across platforms and formats.

In this series of posts, I hope to help provide some insights to help publishers that are still trying to make sense of the market. What challenges do you face in mobile? What specifically would you like insight and tips on? Comment below and I’ll incorporate into the subsequent posts.

What data does a DSP have access to when bidding on an ad exchange?

Ie, what types of information are contained within the cookies made available? Thanks!
This question was asked on Quora.com, below is my answer.

Identity DataIn a typical RTB transaction there’s a user ID, pulled from the user’s cookie or some form of server side system, which is passed to the DSP from the SSP. That ID is, in most cases, the DSPs record locator for the user’s information. Most DSPs have a server side data store where this information is housed, updated and augmented from a variety of sources including data companies like Blue Kai and Excelate and their ilk. DSPs may also be collecting and distilling information based on bid request activity from that user (although most SSPs put language into the contracts governing the use of this “bid stream” data) or retargeting data gathered for their customers. This type of data system is generally referred to as a Data Management Platform (DMP) in the industry. While there are some stand-alone DMPs out there, more and more DSPs are integrating or building their own.

There are a variety of other bits of information about the ad impression that get passed in the bid stream. To get a sense of what might be passed you can look at the Open RTB API (http://code.google.com/p/openrtb/). It is, of course, very technical but there are grids that list out the information being exchanged.

What are the revenue models for SSPs and DSPs?

 What kind of gross margins do they earn? Specifically do SSP/DSPs earn a % of ad spend? If so what is it? Or do they operate on an arbitrage model, straight fee model? I’m looking for specific numbers/percentages. Do the same models apply to both desktop and mobile RTB?
This question was asked on Quora.com, below is my answer.

I can answer some of these questions, but I won’t go into specifics about the percentages since I can only really give you insight into one company with any confidence.

SSP

Revenue Models

On the SSP side the revenue model is based on a percentage of revenue flowing to the publisher. This works well as it lines up the SSP’s incentives with the publisher. The more money the publisher makes – the more money the SSP makes. SSP’s are generally geared toward serving the publishers so that alignment makes for a good relationship.

DSP

On the DSP side I know of two prevalent revenue models. The most prevalent has profits tied to a percentage of spend. This is taking money the same way the SSPs do, so it requires the advertisers that use the DSP to trust that all the algorithms and technology is: A – getting them a good price, and B – fulfilling the requirements of the campaign in the most optimal way. The major DSPs seem to have a good handle on these two elements and appear to be doing fine, even though the financial model doesn’t inherently lend itself to support “A”.  Read more

How are bidding conflicts avoided in a real-time bidding (RTB) environment with multiple ad exchanges and networks?

How are bidding conflicts avoided in a real-time bidding (RTB) environment with multiple ad exchanges and networks?
This question was asked on Quora.com, below is my answer.

In the advertising soup, how do you avoid bidding conflicts?The short answer is that bidding conflicts aren’t avoided. The DSPs have no idea that they are seeing the same impression from multiple sources – whether in serial or parallel. They don’t have anything built to detect such events.

Within a single SSP/exchange the auction can be configured in such a way that if multiple DSPs are bidding for the same advertiser or seat holder then they are not allowed to set the second price for themselves. This is something that we’re considering at Rubicon as we learn more about the perceived problem. As the recent Econsultancy report shows, most buyers are working with more than one DSP. Read more